Back to all videos
Formal Methods6:23

AI Proposes, FMT Proves: A Neuro-Symbolic Workflow

Four short acts: mapping what's formally verifiable, proving a safe AI refactor, catching an unsafe one, and auditing git history for a bug that already shipped.


Video 4 shows what it looks like when an AI assistant and a formal verification engine work together instead of one just trusting the other. Across four short acts, FMT first maps which functions in a real codebase can be formally verified at all, then proves an AI-proposed refactor is safe to merge with zero test coverage, then catches a second AI refactor that looks algebraically correct but silently breaks whenever both inputs are odd, and finally audits the project's git history to flag a bug that already shipped and passed every test. If you've ever wondered how a team gets the speed of AI-assisted coding without inheriting AI-assisted bugs, this is a concrete, four-act answer.

Want to go deeper?

Learn how URSA Secure brings formal verification to your most critical software.

Get in touch